What constitutes a proof? Does establishing cause for an effect constitute adequate proof? Or is the whole notion of proof merely a matter of perception?
Wednesday, 24 August 2005
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Yes, I truly do. Even if the only way to do so is trust machinery weighing a few tons :-) I also like to think. Which is not the same as saying I *do* think, if you know what I mean. Yep, thinking is an area of human activity where I have a lot of catching up to do. Really!
What constitutes a proof? Does establishing cause for an effect constitute adequate proof? Or is the whole notion of proof merely a matter of perception?
No comments:
Post a Comment